AK3Hiker (09-26-2012), Aronold (07-22-2012), AshleyTizzyLover15 (07-22-2012), bignick47 (07-26-2012), bigwillee (08-03-2012), daniel9 (07-27-2012), domi9496 (11-05-2012), driller195 (07-21-2012), gotgoat (07-22-2012), greamanii (07-23-2012), icebergslim97 (07-23-2012), imk (07-22-2012), JohnHanncock (07-24-2012), Loser! (07-21-2012), mantis22 (07-21-2012), marksw (07-28-2012), MinistryOfSkin.com (07-21-2012), muzza57 (07-21-2012), nick4u (07-23-2012), nightd (07-31-2012), petya100 (10-15-2012), phoenix (07-21-2012), pretzelman (07-24-2012), Raziel00 (07-22-2012), romex357 (07-21-2012), RomZomCom (07-23-2012), Schadeschade (07-21-2012), Sentinel67 (07-22-2012), sigfried1972 (07-23-2012), sitonb10 (07-22-2012), The Lurker (07-21-2012), tomalan (07-21-2012), tractor75 (09-09-2012), vvvulturus (07-21-2012), wookiee (07-21-2012)
Thanks for Rebecca Ferdinando....
The Lurker (07-21-2012)
Holy Mary, Sweet Mother of Jesus!![]()
![]()
(BCS edit - enhanced)
Thank God, Dow Chemical, and the women who wear them for see-thru fabrics...
Those puppies are as clear as day!![]()
"Thank you, oh Lord, for women who still have the foresight not to go out in public covered with nipple tape, wear opaque clothing, heavy coats, or false modesty. We beseech thee to implore women to wear less, and think of the poor, neglected needs of men more, everywhere. In Jesus' name, we pray...AMEN!"
![]()
-TL
Last edited by The Lurker; 07-21-2012 at 06:47 PM.
Aronold (07-22-2012), bigwillee (08-03-2012), brizaroni (07-21-2012), daniel9 (07-27-2012), Five-seveN (07-23-2012), imk (07-22-2012), JohnHanncock (07-24-2012), Loser! (07-22-2012), phoenix (07-21-2012), Raziel00 (07-22-2012), RomZomCom (07-23-2012), Sentinel67 (07-22-2012), sigfried1972 (07-23-2012), sitonb10 (07-22-2012), Special_Needs (07-26-2012), tomalan (07-22-2012), vvvulturus (07-21-2012), wookiee (07-21-2012)
Rebecca Ferdinando has nice firm boobies. ..
Thanks for the enhancement Lurker.
I don't always give a woman an orgasm, but when I do she usually spits it out.
Loser! (07-22-2012), The Lurker (07-22-2012)
The Lurker (07-22-2012)
The Lurker (07-22-2012)
I know this has been discussed before, but please keep modified & enhanced images in the celeb x-ray thread, leaving this thread for the originals. Nice BCS adjustment BTW!
Sorry for the watermark tags, but it's the only way I could try to prevent
my work from being stolen and used elsewhere without my permission
Some of my work --> Jennifer Aniston, Jessica Simpson, Britney Spears, Katy Perry, Hayden Panettiere - top & bottom, Maria Menounos -top & bottom, Kelly Ripa, Jennifer Morrison
Bomb (07-23-2012), bretttucker (07-22-2012), The Lurker (07-22-2012)
thanks
The Lurker (07-22-2012)
i hate to pour water on what appears to be a great shot.............
...but is that her nipple, or her finger slipped inside the bikini top to readjust her breast before covering back up fully..???
.......only asking as it looks to be at a strange angle considering the fabric seems to be pulled away from the 'nipple', or what appears to be one...?????
Trouble??? me...never...!!!
Loser! (07-22-2012), Raziel00 (07-22-2012), Sentinel67 (07-22-2012), sigfried1972 (07-23-2012), tomalan (07-22-2012)
Aronold (07-22-2012), bigwillee (08-03-2012), driller195 (07-22-2012), grale (07-22-2012), icebergslim97 (07-23-2012), Legman59 (07-23-2012), phoenix (07-24-2012), Raziel00 (07-22-2012), Sentinel67 (07-22-2012), sigfried1972 (07-23-2012), sitonb10 (07-22-2012), The Lurker (07-22-2012), tomalan (07-22-2012)
hielo33 (07-22-2012), icebergslim97 (07-23-2012), Loser! (07-22-2012), sigfried1972 (07-23-2012), tomalan (07-22-2012)
Indeed...
Strange also to think that many of the folks on this board weren't even alive back then...let alone while we all watched in morbid fascination as a particular white Ford Bronco was seen very slowly 'getting away' on the LA Freeway, broadcast far above from a news helicopter, live on national television.
I remember calling up a friend about it, on this curious contraption attached to a wire leading straight into the wall. I believe the young kids of today refer to it as a 'hard line'...
![]()
...A 'separation of Church and State', so to speak? Hmmm, that's probably a good idea...thanks for the heads-up, c-t.
Thanks very much! Spent some more time working on that one as well ...probably helps that that particular image was like swinging at softballs your friend's lobbing to you.
Over the years, I've found that (while one can predict certain things in regards to cause-and-effect), every image is like a snowflake; no two are alike. With these, it's similar to unwrapping a birthday present that you're not exactly sure what's inside, or how to go about untying the bow on top, but you have a pretty good idea - and that when you do, it'll still be better than whatever your Aunt gave you last year.
That's what makes these so interesting.
-------------------
One o' these days, when you guys have some more time or inclination, I'm sure some of us would love to see a more in-depth 'how-to' as well, methinks.
And (hopefully), t'would inspire some of the other cats here to try their hand at the heuristics of hue, the curiosity of contrast, the levity of levels, the egregiousness of endpoints, and the sublimeness of saturation.
(I mean, can't have folks begging you guys every time they want you to work on their pet model/celeb/gf/poodle for them, can we?)![]()
Anyway, enough talk. Back to the pictures!
-TL
Last edited by The Lurker; 07-22-2012 at 03:24 PM.
just one problem , what consitutes an xray
serisou modification to show something or simple lighting and contrast adjustments ? and who decides ? .
im sorry but i dont see adjusting hte lighting a little as an xray and i dont see a need for a completely different thread just to help us see better on an image were currently discussing
shhhhh , ima ninja
bigwillee (08-03-2012)