AlexDragon (04-12-2012), Big D4 (04-18-2012), bigchap (04-15-2012), bigwillee (04-14-2012), BostonRocks (04-11-2012), bourquerules (04-12-2012), corbin_outlaw (04-12-2012), davis2 (04-12-2012), DreadPirate (04-13-2012), driller195 (04-13-2012), family77 (04-11-2012), Fckr (04-16-2012), Hotrod1 (04-13-2012), hustler077 (04-13-2012), imk (04-18-2012), jackx1 (04-13-2012), kipsgotgame (04-13-2012), LipsofJoy (04-12-2012), liquidgrowl1 (04-12-2012), Loser (04-12-2012), mike80 (04-14-2012), nightd (04-13-2012), popovich (04-11-2012), rhce (04-16-2012), sigfried1972 (04-11-2012), sofa king special (04-17-2012), tatonno (04-16-2012), tipitipitipi (04-12-2012), Toca Viola (04-15-2012), volvo77 (04-17-2012), zhorra (04-11-2012)
Nope, body double
that's what I said.....
Hey guys did you know it's a body double?
i don't think that's really her... i think it's probably a body double.
is it ok if i just pretend its her???
but in Uncovered it's her.
its body double
It just possibly could be a body double if it isn't really her in those shots where nudity may or may not be shown and another person was used (perhaps).
If you scrutinize the images very carefully, I think you'll find that Ms. Beckinsale was using a stand-in for her nudes scenes in this film. In other words, the nudity was provided by an actress other than Ms. Beckinsale. In the movie business, this stand-in is sometimes referred to as a "body double." I hope that eliminates some of the confusion I'm seeing in this thread.