Last edited by badwolf; 03-14-2012 at 12:13 AM.
I was just about to post that selena gomez picture! I see something there
this is a great thread
badwolf (03-16-2012), Bboss (08-19-2012), damnimgood (03-20-2012), fhmbatista (03-25-2012), freddy12345 (03-16-2012), HudVal69 (08-05-2012), ihwf_vp (03-25-2012), imk (04-07-2012), k-lo (03-16-2012), Kaleidoscope (03-16-2012), max-a-million (03-16-2012), nightd (03-16-2012), pretzelman (03-23-2012), stufarq (03-22-2012), wazaa (03-22-2012), XirD (03-26-2012)
The Selena Gomez pic does have some nice pussy bulge/camel toe, but a HQ would make a much nicer x-ray.
Sorry for the watermark tags, but it's the only way I could try to prevent
my work from being stolen and used elsewhere without my permission
Some of my work --> Jennifer Aniston, Jessica Simpson, Britney Spears, Katy Perry, Hayden Panettiere - top & bottom, Maria Menounos -top & bottom, Kelly Ripa, Jennifer Morrison
With PS select Image, then Adjustments, then Curves, then create a squished parabola.
'Flashed' pics do not respond well to this treatment. The trick here is not to kill the midtones and keep the original highlights.
I also use the Ai Picture Explorer freeware app to check 'xray-ablility' by selecting Enhance, then Fix UnderExposure, then Boost Brightness. By repetitive 'boosting', hidden shadows in many pics magically appear
What about light colored material?
it is stupid and a waste to do a pic of someone that takes off their clothes for a living lucy pinder does just that. u can find her nudes easily