Page 787 of 1006 FirstFirst ... 287 687 737 777 785 786 787 788 789 797 837 887 ... LastLast
Results 11,791 to 11,805 of 15077

Thread: The Celebrity X-Ray Thread

  1. #11791
    Post Pimp
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Ether
    Posts
    457
    Thanks
    1,765
    Thanked 6,850 Times in 428 Posts

    Default Like all things, enjoy it while it lasts.

    Quote Originally Posted by couger81 View Post
    Seems to me the See thru pics that are already see thru to begin with are one the rise in this forum lately.
    Consider how 'sexploitaion' videos peaked around 1972 then disappeared, the same is happening here. The see-through 'golden age' peaked around 2005. Celebs now wear flesh-colored, opaque underlayers to give the illusion of being see-through. While a few haute-couture designers continue to push see-through creations, only unknown supermodels agree to wear them.

    A new era of Internet conservatism is upon us and all the content on image servers can suddenly vanish like MegaUpload. JMHO.

    Bolo777: 7of9 from unimatrix one is a character from Star Trek which Jeri Ryan is famous for.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to iCeleb For The Above Post:

    maczac (03-27-2012)

  3. #11792
    I like this place xrayray's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    417
    Thanks
    176
    Thanked 2,238 Times in 525 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iCeleb View Post


    kral: Doing dark material is not easy. Like c-through says, it depends on the material, lighting and pose. For example, the Lea Seydoux pic is doable since the stretched sweater allows light between the woven material ... but it requires tons of work!

    JLH's stretched, wet bikini also allows some gradient light differences and is made clearer by messing around with the saturation plane. This means separating the image by using the HLS (Hue-Light-Saturation) and HSB (Hue-Saturation-Brightness) models, playing with the Curves function, then recombining to get the VERY subtle differences.

    Play with the Miley Cyrus 'instructable' to get your feet wet then learn about the RGB, HLS and HSB color models. Xray-ing is fun.
    http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=92874&page=786

    rocker2012: Lea Seydoux can be seen naked (explicit) in many movies ...

    Petit Tailleur - http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=503068
    La Belle Personne - http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=413732
    Belle Epine - http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=709833
    fun read and good input, thanks for bringing something different to the table
    Mod edit.No offsite links allowed

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to xrayray For The Above Post:

    iCeleb (03-27-2012), wazaa (04-16-2012)

  5. #11793
    Beginner
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    19
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default

    Hey Iceleb and cthrough could you guys try these images pls....(just the downstairs area)

    Adriana Lima: http://img283.imagevenue.com/img.php...a_123_63lo.jpg
    http://img102.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_454lo.jpg

    Vida Guerra: http://img287.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_337lo.jpg

    pls do whatever one looks like it would be easiest to do with the 2 Adriana pics. I think the one with her with the grey lingerie on the catwalk looks semi see through and could be easily made fully see through! so pls try if you agree.

    Thx guys.

  6. #11794
    Post Pimp
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Ether
    Posts
    457
    Thanks
    1,765
    Thanked 6,850 Times in 428 Posts

    Default Jessica Alba (out on the town, still an ingenue)



    Remastered work of crimsonknight3 ... he was on to something.
    http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=92874&page=461

    opo: excellent work here ... would make DaS proud ... wherever he is
    http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=92874&page=638

    Have to go slipstream for a while ... later!

  7. The Following 26 Users Say Thank You to iCeleb For The Above Post:

    AliciaKeysWorship (03-23-2012), badwolf (03-24-2012), Bally1970 (05-14-2012), big4blue1 (03-25-2012), BurntPopsicles (03-23-2012), candyass (04-20-2012), corrupted (03-24-2012), drcooper (03-24-2012), driller195 (03-24-2012), Gentleman Ghost (03-23-2012), ihwf_vp (03-25-2012), imk (04-07-2012), k-lo (03-24-2012), Kaleidoscope (03-24-2012), max-a-million (03-23-2012), nightd (03-24-2012), opo (03-24-2012), pretzelman (03-23-2012), sirmartinfrobisher (04-03-2012), stevelo (03-23-2012), stufarq (03-31-2012), tacomaguy20 (03-24-2012), trooper666 (03-24-2012), wazaa (04-16-2012), whats2u (03-24-2012), wilma (12-02-2012)

  8. #11795
    I'm probably spamming
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    12
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 6 Times in 1 Post

    Default

    Hey guys, love your work. I've tried to do similar things using photoshop and other programmes but have never been able to hit that sweet spot.

    Would anybody be able to give these a try?

    Michaela Tabb 1 ~ http://img158.imagevenue.com/img.php..._122_460lo.JPG
    Michaela Tabb 2 ~ http://img288.imagevenue.com/img.php...0_122_49lo.JPG

    Many thanks

  9. #11796
    Ignoring the true trolls c-through's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    in a van DOWN BY THE RIVER!
    Posts
    3,248
    Thanks
    1,330
    Thanked 7,984 Times in 1,398 Posts

    Default

    Bolo Sorry - without seeing the rest of the pic, I don't know who's cameltoe that is, besides the fact that it's pretty highly compressed, so there's really not much more detail to be pulled out.

    In the second pic, it's just a ruffle in the panties, and you can clearly see she's got on another pair underneath them - most runway & photoshoots are like that.

    If Vida was standing in that pic it might be possible, but with the material not being tight it makes it almost impossible to do unless it was partially see-through.

    Mrmario - don't know who Michaela Tabb is, but it appears that she's wearing a bra. With dark colors it's pretty hard anyways unless a very bright flash is used, and it's an UHQ image. Unfortunately neither is the case here.
    Sorry for the watermark tags, but it's the only way I could try to prevent
    my work from being stolen and used elsewhere without my permission

    Some of my work --> Jennifer Aniston, Jessica Simpson, Britney Spears, Katy Perry, Hayden Panettiere - top & bottom, Maria Menounos -top & bottom, Kelly Ripa, Jennifer Morrison

  10. #11797
    Beginner
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    19
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default

    K I give up lol

  11. #11798
    Look at me I got 100+ posts
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    136
    Thanks
    1,373
    Thanked 62 Times in 31 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eagleeye477 View Post
    it is stupid and a waste to do a pic of someone that takes off their clothes for a living lucy pinder does just that. u can find her nudes easily
    By that way of logic there would never be a point to see a woman in lingerie if you've seen her nude. The whole point is the temptation, the allure of seeing something which is not quite visible. It's sexy.

  12. #11799
    Attention Whore
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    273
    Thanks
    9,847
    Thanked 1,408 Times in 149 Posts

    Default Christina Aguilera

    Curious to see the evolution of the enhancement process. Please try these pics.
    Past Phun:

    ---------------------------------------------






    I'd like to see a few different people try these.
    I would also like to see a flood of new pics to try for the restless.
    Post some requests people. Keep this thread busy!
    Last edited by corrupted; 03-24-2012 at 12:19 PM.

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to corrupted For The Above Post:

    shad0wrider (03-24-2012), wazaa (04-16-2012)

  14. #11800
    Ignoring the true trolls c-through's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    in a van DOWN BY THE RIVER!
    Posts
    3,248
    Thanks
    1,330
    Thanked 7,984 Times in 1,398 Posts

    Default

    Who was the original x-rayer? Please don't repost other's work without giving credit.

    It's not for lack of requests that this thread isn't busy, it's the lack of good truly x-rayable material, and the availability of time for the few people that understand how to do the processes well that limits how many good x-rays are posted. Many celebs now know about the paparazzi flashes making garments almost transparent, and are taking precautions with nipple tape, or not wearing the fabrics that are susceptible. It's not like there's an x-ray app, you just press a button, and the clothes magically disappear, it takes talent & time. I've tried to teach people how to do it in the past, but there really weren't any that seemed to understand and start posting themselves.

    We don't just need a flood of pics that don't have hope; that will just water down the x-ray'd pics that much more, and this thread will end up like the amateur x-ray thread. Please let the bulk of the image selection be up to the x-rayers who know what to look for, and pre-screen a lot of pics before posting good ones.
    Sorry for the watermark tags, but it's the only way I could try to prevent
    my work from being stolen and used elsewhere without my permission

    Some of my work --> Jennifer Aniston, Jessica Simpson, Britney Spears, Katy Perry, Hayden Panettiere - top & bottom, Maria Menounos -top & bottom, Kelly Ripa, Jennifer Morrison

  15. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to c-through For The Above Post:

    couger81 (03-25-2012), monss (03-24-2012)

  16. #11801
    I like to party
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    194
    Thanks
    310
    Thanked 3,726 Times in 98 Posts

    Default

    Slightly clearer version of the same Selena Gomez picture posted a few pages back. Can anything be done here or is it not worth it?


  17. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ilove2quack For The Above Post:

    PappaBoner (08-24-2012), wilma (12-02-2012)

  18. #11802
    Attention Whore
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    273
    Thanks
    9,847
    Thanked 1,408 Times in 149 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by c-through View Post
    Who was the original x-rayer? Please don't repost other's work without giving credit.
    I have no idea. It's from the early days of this thread. Was wondering what the other's in here could reproduce with their talents. There's definitely a contrast of styles going through the history of this thread.
    Quote Originally Posted by c-through View Post
    It's not like there's an x-ray app, you just press a button, and the clothes magically disappear.
    I don't think you understand how this whole process works.

    Quote Originally Posted by c-through View Post
    Please let the bulk of the image selection be up to the x-rayers who know what to look for, and pre-screen a lot of pics before posting good ones.
    I'm sure you look through a lot of images to try, but most can't view every image on the net for candidates. It's good to have all the material you can to work with. People shouldn't hesitate to post images that they think are worthy and that may have slipped through the cracks.

    IDK, I just like what you guys are doing. Thanks for all the tireless work it takes to produce these and keep it up.

  19. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to corrupted For The Above Post:

    anvilusa (03-25-2012), c-through (03-25-2012)

  20. #11803
    Pixel Pusher The Lurker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    In Your Peripheral Vision
    Posts
    2,151
    Thanks
    9,045
    Thanked 11,728 Times in 1,281 Posts

    Default

    I believe c-through's point is that, if one has even the faintest idea of what makes a good candidate - which anyone who's been following this thread for as little as a dozen pages or more certainly does - then there'd be a lot more restraint by folks posting images here.

    Instead, what we get is:


    • People who haven't bothered to read the guidelines, and/or re-post the same pics submitted earlier (and often only 1-2 pages back, too);


    • Lazy sots who don't even have the courtesy to post the actress' name, assuming we all must know this person simply because they do - assumption is the worst conceit, folks;


    • People posting random, low-res, celebs-in-two-inch-thick fabrics, hoping that their photo will 'buck the trend'



    ...and so on.


    "Hey, can you do this postage-sized image of Jane Fonda in a winter coat behind that tree in the dark under a new moon? Thanx!!!!!"

    Simply put, there's every indication that many folks just 1) haven't read the rules, 2) aren't pre-screening, 3) aren't paying attention at all, and 3) don't respect the actual do-er's time...

    ...because if they did, they'd stop posting crap.


    I've seen literally millions of photos over the years, and from working at my last two boards (p-w, and before that, pornbb), and the number of good candidates is literally 1 in 5-6,000 photos, if that.

    That means: folks should stop posting the other 4,999 in this thread!



    To be fair, most folks don't need to actually know how a microwave works in order to be able to use one - let alone build one themselves - but c'mon, folks. Make an effort here! This ain't rocket science. Be selective in what you consider before asking the artists to donate their considerable - and valuable - time.


    Look, everyone knows that you need:

    1) Thin Fabrics
    2) High-res images
    3) Good back-/flash- lighting from underneath the garment (i.e. reflection off the skin)
    4) NO PATTERNS!!!! Smooth, consistent, uniform materials only
    5) KNOWN celebrities with NAMES attached! No random models, girlfriends, sisters-in-law, or whatever. There's another thread for that.


    If folks aren't going to learn to do this themselves - they should at least make an effort...not to try and piss off the ones that are (doing the work).

    (We even had some guy trying to re-post work from this thread using a paid image host on our forums for money. I've since trashed his thread. )


    Gets kinda annoying after awhile - doesn't it, guys?


    Quality, not quantity.


    N'est-ce pas?


    Cheers,

    -TL (porn-W Mod)
    Last edited by The Lurker; 03-25-2012 at 07:37 AM.

  21. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to The Lurker For The Above Post:

    Bally1970 (05-14-2012), c-through (03-25-2012), iCeleb (03-27-2012), Kaleidoscope (03-26-2012)

  22. #11804
    Look at me I got 100+ posts
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    107
    Thanks
    130
    Thanked 219 Times in 49 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by c-through View Post
    Who was the original x-rayer? I've tried to teach people how to do it in the past, but there really weren't any that seemed to understand and start posting themselves.
    I was following you xray uni tutorial a couple of years ago but you stopped halfway.

    Quote Originally Posted by corrupted View Post
    I don't think you understand how this whole process works.
    If c-through didn't know how to xray then he wouldn't be posting.
    Last edited by couger81; 03-25-2012 at 12:59 AM.
    If you X-ray it they will come

  23. #11805
    I haven't left the house all week Stab Master Arson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Chicago............ BANG!! BANG!!
    Posts
    811
    Thanks
    3,745
    Thanked 2,745 Times in 384 Posts

    Default

    Whuttup Phuners?!!! I haven't posted in this thread for a while...
    I've been looking over the recent requests and thought I'd try doing a few from the "dark-material-matrix" that always seems to trick us into thinking there is something there.
    Ok, so here are a few quick ones I tried:

    Jennifer Love Hewitt


    Mariah Carey




    Sofia Vergara



    Taylor Swift



    Taylor Swift OG pic fixed link:


    ...as always, all i do is adjust lightness and darkness then adjust sharpness, then maybe a little color. Anything after that, i think goes into the fakeness dept, but thats just me. Thanks to all x-rayers that contribute to this, one of the best threads on all the internets!!! We all learn from each other!
    Last edited by Stab Master Arson; 03-26-2012 at 03:44 AM.

  24. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Stab Master Arson For The Above Post:

    badwolf (03-29-2012), decompiler (06-28-2012), maranello (03-26-2012), nightd (03-26-2012), opo (03-27-2012), wazaa (04-16-2012), wilma (12-02-2012)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •