Miley Cyrus Hacked Pic in Shower (covered) Tag Removed

Yet... you clicked on the link like the rest of us... Hhmmm.....

 

I said it before, but: There's nothing wrong with pics of Miley and I think the beach candids were right on the edge but these "leaked" personal pics are going too far.

 

it will only be going to far when she's naked in front of a camera and still underage.

 

the worst thing by far in all the comments and posts here, is until pugface Miley comes forth and says "I TOOK THESE" - THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO POSITIVE PROOF THAT ANY OF THESE PICTURES ARE HER WHATSOEVER.

if anyone has POSITIVE PROOF of it, let's see it, because the guy who has a blogged link here about the fact that he's "seen the pictures" means shit. unless of course everything you read on the internet is true...

 

wow sheesh

 

Here's the text from the estocado link above:

--------------------
THOSE MILEY CYRUS PICS
14
07
2008
Some news about those Miley Cyrus pics from the dude who sent them in:

TrainReq’s door is basically being beaten down by Disney lawyers. They’re scaring the hell out of him. He has 6 more pictures of Miley Cyrus, all of which were sent to Nick Jonas of The Jonas Brothers. He was trying to sell them, which probably is making matters worse. Hacking emails is illegal, afterall.

Anyway, I’ve seen the pictures. He showed them to me in person on his computer. He won’t risk sending them out. Miley’s not exactly naked in any of them, but as I said before everything can be seen.

I’ll break them down for you.

First picture: Miley in a black see-through babydoll with black panties. Thanks to the flash of the camera her nipples are clearly visible. I don’t know if she had the camera on a timer or a friend took it, because she’s standing free in front of a closet. The babydoll is probably this version (in black)

Second picture: Miley topless with her hands covering/cupping her breasts. She’s wearing white shorts. In front of the same closet as before. Still freestanding.

Third picture: This time she’s in a purple bra and panty set. The panties are see-through. She’s shaved. She’s in the same room as the other two, but in front of a dresser with a TV playing a Toyota commercial. Still freestanding.

Fourth picture: Back in the shower room as before. Pretty much the same shot as before, but this time we see a lot more of her ass with the wet t-shirt clinging to it.

Fifth picture: Still in the shower, this time facing the camera. She has her right arm covering her boobs, but the shirt is plastered to her bald crotch.

Sixth picture: Last one. And definitely my favorite. She’s facing the camera in the shower, one hand on her hip, the other by her side. Except for a few pockets where air got in her shirt is totally see-through. Both breasts with hard nipples and her crotch are clearly seen. She’s basically completely naked.

TrainReq sent these out to several potential clients, but I don’t know their status. With the lawyers going apeshit anything can happen. By the way, just so you know, I’m 17 years old, so even if these pictures are deemed illegal because of Miley’s age (15 in all of them), it’s still legal for me to see them. At least that’s my understanding. Since they’re not pornographic TrainReq has been assured that they are legal, since just seeing an underage girl naked is fine so long as it’s not sexual in nature.
-------------------------------------------------

So. ... Oh. I'm supposed to say something. She is in SHOW BUSINESS. They eat their own children in Hollywood. It's been that way for (literally) a hundred years. She's a kid with a great bod. Who's not gonna look?!

 

2001 is correct, who wont look...besides...everyones wang is jumping for joy when she appears...i already got my ticket from Mr. Freeze for the hell bus

 

Too damn bad we will never see those pics though

 

NONE OF YOU HAVE PROOF OF ANYTHING. i read that 'blog' too and i guess based on a lot of your mentally deranged posts then that's gotta be her. sorry, and thanks for recopying it here you dumbfuck, because reading it through the link posted didnt have me convinced it was her... but NOW that its here, you've changed my mind completely. wtf im done with this

 

Why don't you chill out. Here is the facts best case it is her, worst case it ain't. Either way hardly worth getting one's knickers in a twist

 

Yeah but remember her Dad was taking the pictures

 

Can't go wrong using `knickers in a twist` in any sentence.

I thank you.

 

Time for the monthly reminder that nude pictures of ANY lone person at ANY age, be they 15 months old, 15 years old, or 150 years old, are completely legal as long as the subject is not in an undeniably sexual position, or doing any undeniably sexual act.

The nude form is ART and is NOT disgusting OR ILLEGAL.

 

...Your Honour.

 

i want boobies.

 

I have still no clue why she is famous...

 

Ok...

 

I don't care as long as she gives like christmas....

 

when will her sex tape come out?