Blake Lively alleged leaked nudes - x5 [ADDS]

The various theories here that she leaked thes photos herself are baffling to say the least.

 

If it's really her, how stupid do you have to be to take photos of yourself on your camera? I know many celebs aren't always the brightest, but you have to be a complete idiot to think that nothing bad could ever come of it, especially if you're in the press a lot.

You really need to calm down. You're acting like a fool.

 

Why? She has a nice career but she's hardly a big name. I think most (perhaps all) celebs believe any publicity is good publicity. So she leaks the pics right before a big film comes out, she starts f'ing ... sorry "dating" ... Leo and now everyone is talking about Blake Lively. Look at how Erin Andrews manipulated nude pics taken of her into a gigantic career opportunity. In the old days of Hollywood, young actresses hoping to be seen would show up at restaurants or parties and be photographed near a big star. These days, they take nude pics of themselves and leak them on the Internet.

I think it's her and I think she leaked them. I could be wrong and if so I'll still enjoy looking at them.

 

What the hell are you talking about? What career opportunity? Erin Andrews was already one of the most popular "reporters" on ESPN before the video hit the net, and Blake Lively was on one of network TV's most popular shows in the key demographic, AND she's in the new sure-to-be summer blockbuster movie. What's the gain from showing your tits? What, just because some of us pervs are talking about her on the net? We were talking about her anyway, every time a pap gets a shot of her on the street.

I'm sure some girls leak these things, but you're talking about socialites like Paris Hilton and Kim K who had no careers otherwise. Blake is rich and famous and on the rise. There's nothing to gain here. What has Erin Andrews done since the video? What career-launching gigs has she had since?

 

I'm not impressed with huge tits either, especially if their fake.

 

?

 

Erin Andrews was an ESPN reporter before the nude video. Now she's on Dancing With The Stars and going to the Oscars. Her career SOARED after that incident. The funny thing about that video is it was online for months before she confirmed it was her. People speculated it might be her but nobody knew for sure because the video wasn't real clear. Then Erin Andrews tells the world something a very small percentage of people ever would have known before hand and all of a sudden she's not just an ESPN reporter anymore. Now she's a "celebrity."

There is no way anyone can convince me she didn't manipulate that situation for career gain. Sorry.

As far as Blake, again I'll say that she has a nice TV career but she's hardly a well-known name. She hasn't become a movie star which is almost certainly her career goal. She has everything to gain by generating more publicity. All she has to do is deny the pics are her and people think she's still all sweet and wonderful. But if you believe the rumor mill, she's anything but as she's been connected to both Ben Affleck and Ryan Reynolds when they were married. If those rumors were true - and the Afleck one sure sounds like it is - I don't see why a young actress who f's married men would refrain from doing just about anything possible to generate more publicity for herself.

Such as leaking personal nude pics, for example.

Just my two cents.

 

I agree with you in general, Undercover.

But I'd say the "Leo affair" smacks more of a planned PR campaign before Green Lantern comes out than the release of bathroom photos, which is probably uncontrolled from a third party.

 

That definitely could be. I agree about the PR-vibe about the Leo thing and maybe these photos are like the Hudgens, Alba and other ones that were part of that massive hacked celeb cell phone deal that has been talked about. I wouldn't rule that out.

I just figure if a young actress is willing to bang married men to get ahead she'll do just about anything. But I am a cynic by nature.

 

Hard to say, but i think its a fake..

 

No, that doesn't follow at all. First of all, Erin Andrews was a minor celebrity before the incident. That's why it was such a big deal when it happened. And "Dancing With The Stars" is about as far from a "career opportunity" as it gets. That's a place where athletes, B-listers, and has-beens go to get a quick payday, but nobody turns it into anything, In fact, the only people who have made careers out of that show in any minor way have been the dancers, not the stars.

So, I ask again, what has Erin Andrews done with this incident? How has her career been forwarded? A spot on DWTS isn't anything. Hines Ward and Kirstie Alley were on it this year, I suppose they're about to hit it big too?

And Blake absolutely is a household name, depending on what household you live in. If you've got teenage or tweenage kids, bet your ass they know who she is. And the people who cast The Green Lantern wouldn't have put her in the movie if she didn't have a following or appeal. Is she as well-known as Gweneth Paltrow? No, of course not, but putting out a picture of her tits sure as hell isn't going to bridge that gap.

Occam's Razor, my friend. The simplest explanation is often the best. And the simple explanation is that this is that hacker ring once again trying to rain on the parade of a celebrity who is about to have a movie released by releasing nude pictures of them.

 

I think it's a pretty big leap to assume a star of a show on the CW is a major celebrity. Blake Lively is not a movie star. Not even close.

As far as Erin Andrews, nobody would have even known about the video had she not confirmed it. As I said, it was online for months and despite that there was no conclusive proof it was her and many dismissed it because there was no conclusive proof. Then Erin comes along and confirms a video hardly anyone would have seen became an enormous point of interest. And right after that, her career took off in a completely new direction. Forgive me, but how many other ESPN female reporters are on reality shows and showing up on the red carpet at the Oscars? Did I miss Rachel Nichols there this year?

Am I a cynic? Absolutely. But that doesn't mean I'm wrong.

 

Meh.
If I was a female celeb and wanted to created buzz with my naked body I would never go and leak nude pics.
I'd just create Playboy buzz and then pose for them. I'd even get money from it, free publicity and I wouldn't even have to really get naked as recent Playboy history has shown.
And avoid all the nasty negative comments since a Playboy shoot is viewed more favorable & "artsy"

But to be honest i don't really give a fuck how and why such pics come out. Just keep them coming.

 

Thighs, calves, hips, ass...they're all the same, especially side-by-side...
Why are a lot of people in such denial that she'd do something like this? Take a look over in the amateur forum for a kazillion examples of stupid young immature bitches making duck lips in the mirror and there's your answer to where Blake's mentality would be at her age and in this day and age. It's her, and God bless her for doing them.

 

It's an exact match. Down to the little extra curvature on the left cheek

 

I don't feel like trudging through 11 pages to see if someone mentioned it, but the exact same iPhone case has been spotted in her hands at numerous times by different paparazzi. That doesn't 100% confirm it, but I think it's almost certainly her.

 

I reckon it's her. Fingers crossed for some pussy shots now

 

She doesn't need the buzz though really. She has enough big roles coming up.

 

nice one me like

 

That's a good edit you've made, hope you don't mind me making an edit of your edit of my edit ... :mrgreen:

There are still marks on her back that can be spotted, the red circled mark for example still can be sort of spotted in a similar place in the mirror shot. The two marks in the green circle would be pulled slightly around her shoulder because of the position of her arm, and there does seem to be something in the corresponding position(?) in the mirror shot, though slightly covered by her hair. I've had a go matching them again, and I'm interested what everyone thinks?

Either way, the birthmarks of the two pics would not match up perfectly even if it were real, as the pic on the right is from a slightly higher angle and naturally distorts her skin slightly (eg, it says something that her feet fit into the right picture but not the left). It's interesting to look at, anyway.