Blake Lively alleged leaked nudes - x5 [ADDS]

woot!

 

for the history books, can anyone tell me when exactly she got the implants?

 

pretty hot regardless of who it is

 

I think There's a picture that's showing her wearing a bracelet with a letter "B" on it......just check it...

 

Not even close, Shmee.

First of all, Blake was never a B actress. She was on one of the most popular shows on television, as well as starring in several very big movies for a long time now. She was in that Traveling Pants movie like six or seven years ago. She's never been a B actress. Second, this "small role" you're talking about is the female lead in a summer blockbuster superhero movie. That's the polar opposite of a small role. There aren't any roles bigger than that, in fact.

There is no free press needed for the Green Lantern flick. Its marketing budget is probably twice Spain's GDP, so it wouldn't matter if these pictures were plastered on a billboard in Times Square, it wouldn't get as much attention as the ad campaign for the movie will.

Her career is already on the rise. She's been the lead or supporting actress in several major motion pictures, and arguably the most popular tweenage girl show in the last decade in Gossip Girl (though I suppose Gilmore Girls might have a case). Shit like nude pictures and sex tapes might help give a bump to socialite nobodies like Paris Hilton and Kim Kardashian, but the most any of them are going to get out of those things are reality TV franchises. No one has ever turned nude pictures into a film career, and Blake Lively has no need for such cheap exposure, since she's already in what's bound to be the summer's biggest movie.

Come on, people. Use your heads. There's clearly a correlation between the release of these pictures and films starring the actresses in question, but that's the hackers' MO, not the actresses'. You want to argue that Paris Hilton OK'd the release of her sex tape? I'm with you. Kim K signed off on her own? Yep. Chyna? Absolutely. But these girls are A-listers, or thereabouts, and there's no way they're doing this to themselves.

 

Fair enough, I'll try and keep it concise because I've ranted in this thread enough already!

To use the pic I've used (probably too much) over the last couple of days, look at the triangle of birthmarks circled in red:


If the chest pic was taken in a mirror, those birthmarks would be on the other side. The same group of birthmarks are visible in the same place in the nude pic of her neck 'tattoo', that suggests that neither nude pic has been taken in a mirror. However, if you look here:

And at your pic here:

You can see that the neck tattoo and stars are on the wrong side, how? I similarly thought that maybe the film was mirrored, but this can be ruled out because the prominent mole next to her nose is still on the correct side. The only explanation, as suggested earlier, is that at some stage make-up decided that the stars and neck tattoo should be moved to the opposite side.

 

i gotta say if that nice round shapely ass shot is Blakes, and i have many pictures of her ass that do NOT look like that ass shot in the black G, then i'm good for for the rest of time, and i've been ing to the wrong image of her ass would look like w/o clothes in my head for over 3 years now... the ones i've kept longest we can use to compare - maybe - because her ass is so round in a Herve Leger dress that it's a 100% match to that ass in the black G-string? same goes with the really really tight jeans - cause her ass does not look that shapely in the blue shorts or the white dress.

also personally, i really REALLY enjoy ing to blake's ass - and i can 100% guarantee - that these ones i'm posting are her (except for the g-string one). of course we can maybe - IDK - match up the shape of her ass in all these and somehow confirm then that it's her? hee - i'm joking around - i really dont give a shit if it is or not.

 

dont know who she is but wow!

 

Must not stop

 

This keeps getting better by the day!!! Just keep denying so more can come along!!! )))

 

elementary slerby!

 

I think it's pretty obvious they changed sides at some point during filming. I'm sure it isn't unheard of to make cosmetic changes after the filming has started. Some movies have even changed lead actors during filming (see: Back to the Future, V for Vendetta).

And what's the alternative? It's obviously her.

 

Fuck, what an ASS....I love her so much. Must search all of phun for more pics to beat off until penis falls off!

 

^
look at that ass in the next to last pic in that dress
now that is an ass

 

man i have more of her pretty face in HQ too, they can be critiqued till we all blow our brains out.

and more ass after as well. all HQ - all fest worthy.

 

fuck ya - and hey can anyone spot the phone in the shot of her in the Hevre Leger dress? i think it's the same one !!!!

 

Well, quite! It's clearly her, those birthmarks couldn't possibly be faked with such precision, it would be a gargantuan task, for nothing. I'm only going over it to establish why, I don't want the naysayers using it as a 'proof' that it's a fake. I'm glad to hear you say that you think it's a fairly routine cosmetic change, I quite agree. There is no alternative other than a change in make-up, that's the conclusion I was hinting towards

 

hells yeah! I want to see more pics

 

more:




more shots of that healthy ass and a couple more of her in that white outfit - cause she's beyond worthy here:

 

^
ASS DRESS!!!!!