FORUM ISSUES

Stacy Ferguson would be a good name

 

please remove
http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=893983&p=6411054#post6411054

 

Since Flippy deleted his please rename to other to Stacy "Fergie" Ferguson

 

mine was a repost mainly because the previous poster decided not to use her full name but the nickname.

 

Ummmm...
http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=893855 OK
http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=893853 OK
http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=893874 ?

 

Un-approved picture host used on the screenshots in all of his posts

http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=893800

 

i see your point the problem is which thread should i merge it with?

 

I would put it with the first one posted to be fair. http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=893853

 

Please fix the name to Ana Mulvoy Ten in http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=894058 Sorry, my bad.

 

personally don`t mind lean, "uncluttered" sections, but...
a) a thread still gets more attention than adds - and especially newer goodwilling members should be granted to make a standing here
b) where`s the limit in adding picsets into existing threads? things like "the official, only, exclusive red-carpet-photoshooting-thread of the oscars feb 26th 2012"?

 

I just brought it up for attention. Flippy mention merging them. I just it was worth a look at. I see your point and his. Where do you draw the line? I could easily start 10-15 threads like the on in question with multiple people (I won't) but you get the drift. You guys are in charge.

 

probably. but probably not only we. in the end we all should be able to live with it, in certain limits.

 

Could someone put 'Adds' in the title of this one:

http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=893848


Thank you kindly!

 

Please delete this repost. My bad. I didn't think to look at the UK GQ from the month before, but alas, same pix

http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=894086

 

your wish is my command.

 

Is it ok to add upgrade pictures to a post from 2012? The ones in the post are HQs. The ones I found are UHQ.

 

any additions are fine if they add something to the thread. For example if its the same quality and same pics that are being posted it might be a bit redundant and repetitive. I cant tell the difference between HQ and UHQ so im gonna let it stay.

 

THat was a typo, it should have said 2010, not 2012. IT is a couple years old. Still the same answer?

 

From my point of view yes.

2. Do not resurrect old threads or comment on threads that are more than 2 weeks old, unless you have new pictures to add. If you have pics to add to an old topic, you can do so if the pics in that thread are still active. If not, please post a new thread and link back to the old one.


The thread is still active and you added a pic with slightly better quality so it adds some additional value to the thread.