Jamie Lynn Spears - Poolside in a Bikini ~ Instagram Pictures (5/27/12) LQ

Love me some Jamie Lynn ...

 

You're the one JO'ing to it. ;-)

 

Jamie Lynn is a very hot babe!

 

thx for Jamie Lynn

 

Yeah, I'm sure her first thought and concern after the picture was taken was, "Crap! If I leave Maddie in, the people won't have masturbation material!" -_-

 

do you not like mother daughter pictures?

 

lol

 

If it weren't for the kid, we would never of had these pics in the first place. Jamie isn't some camera whore "as evident due to the rarity of the photos posted of her since she gave birth in the first place." So if posing for the camera with her kid gets her to take some bikini pics then who the hell cares! Besides it's pretty much a given going into a Jamie thread that her kid will be in it, since that's how she is. Oh and it wouldn't be a surprise if many people remembered her child's name, because when many people found out that she got pregnant from Casey Aldridge at such a young age that resulted in her leaving Zoey and going into isolation from the spotlight. So of course I'm going to know names, because it was all over the news :dot:

 

It's easy these days with media covering the celebs 24/7. You would have to be in a cave to not know it.

 

There's this cool new website where you can look things up. It's called Google. Maybe you've heard of it?

 

or a 50 year old pedophile.

so you went on google and searched for the name of jamie lynns infant daughter?

 

Yes. And your point? It's not like I looked at her pictures.

 

well, seeing as how you havent left the house all week, and youre on the internet looking up names of 1 year olds...... id have to agree that it is pretty creepy.

 

I'm not going to make accusations against anyone here, as any would be unfounded, but if I were to be suspicious of anyone, it would be of someone who argues that there is anything sexually perverse about an innocent photo of a mother posing poolside with her four year old daughter. Those of us who are mature adults can enjoy an adult in a bikini without shitting ourselves because there is a toddler within view. Some people really need to learn how to choose their battles, for fuck sake.

Btw, I happen to know that Tom and Katie both have a child named Suri. You'd better call the Feds on me, because obviously this knowledge makes me a pedo.

 

is kylie jenner an adult?

 

I'm just going to assume that you're "special", so I'll speak to you as such.

This site is not about posting pics of underage girls, so therefore we do not post pics strictly of Jamie Lynn Spears' daughter. However, posting a pic of Jamie Lynn Spears -- which also happens to include her daughter, and is a pic that would be considered inoffensive in People, or in any major family-geared entertainment publication -- should not be a problem for anybody except those who are sick in the head themselves.

By your logic, if somebody took a photograph of a crowded beach full of bikini-clad beauties, but there were also a few children in view with their parents, then that photo would automatically be considered kiddie porn. But MOST of us are bright enough to make the proper distinction.

Your Kylie Jenner example make no sense, but I'll indulge you anyway (by the way... how DO you even know her name? lol). I personally have no interest in any of the Jenners or Kardashians, but if I was to see a photo of with any or all of them, and Kylie happened to be in the photo as well, I wouldn't freak out and act like I just committed a crime. However, if people started posting pics strictly of Kylie in a bikini, then that would not be representative of the target and ethics of this site.

Also, I have throughout my life been shown pictures by friends and family members of their babies and toddlers in bubble baths and the like, and amazingly I didn't think of the pics in a sexual way. Just as I didn't of Jamie Lynn's daughter. But I guess I'm just crazy in that way.

 

yes, there is a difference. my point is this dude is looking up infants on google and also has kylie in his pathetic top 10 list. are we seeing a theme here? wanker

uh.......... this site is about posting under and of age women. just because phun says 16, it doesnt make them of age in the real world fella.
i never said anything about the pics lol........... i was only shocked that some of these old dogs are looking up the names of infants.

wrong again! by my logic, if a 50 year old is spending his time searching up infants names on google then something is wrong.

i happened to see it mentioned on tv, i wasnt on the nets searching her up, as well as infants.

me too!