The NEW 2001pm - Phun Random Chat Thread!

Hey Cold!

Hey PM!

doing well guys. was off today and won't go back to work until Monday. it will be a niiiiice long weekend.

 

Fergie also looks good in that one

 

I'm going to rustle up some dinner. brb...

 

:hi:

quick question, if Chloe Moretz is only 16, (born feb 10, 1997) Why is she being posted on phun?

http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=1126732

With regular users posting they know she's still jailbait? Havent we been hammering the whole underage thing just in the last couple weeks? Apparently I'm missing something somewhere. I didnt see a red online ATM, so I guess I'll post it in the phun issues thread.

What's up guys?

 

Fergie may be a bit under rated. She has a few songs that have become classic pop songs that remind you of the era. She's part of the sound track of our lives. EVERYONE knows a few Fergie songs.

oh and her ass looks almost as good in spandex as Shakira's!

 

Laters PM, enjoy

:hi: Cy

 

I believe that the rules allow for 16 and older ....

 

I believe 16 is the allowable age, Cy.

 

If the pics are taken while she's 16 it's okay to post

 

Ah, well, that's pretty odd almost all US based forums are 18. I guess I never even thought about it.

 

:hi: Throbbn, PM, Cold

 

my stance has always been "this is a porn forum", no one under 18 is allowed to be a member and no one under 18 should be posted.

You be quite surprised at how loudly that concept gets shouted down. I even had one asshole suggest that maybe I have a problem with attraction to underage girls since I brought it up.

I mean c'mon - some look grown up ... but 95% do not. They are skinny developing girls ... It used to be the young stars were over 18 and built like Jennifer Love Hewitt.

No disrespect to anyone intended, but IMHO allowing under 18 is one of many issues that have humbled Phun.

 

The rule is 18 for nudity.

 

it was discussed ENDLESSLY. Folks even opined "I could fuck her in my country, why can't we post her?"

the people who discuss/debate this stuff usually don't understand the ramifications ... and the mods agree to it to appease ... then when they are issues, teh mods say we can't be everywhere.

draw a fucking line in the sand I say! and don't tolerate any bullshit.

which is why I'll never be a mod.

oh while I'm at it, I think that a larger percentage of mods should be culled from the "content" forums. Most come from "chat" and its a whole different ballgame in the contend forums.

 

hey Cy!

 

again, no disrespect but as a member I'm not proud of posts of 16 y.o. girls with multiple comments from guys saying how much they want to fuck her.

Low rent for sure - and a bit reckless I think.

 

My Opinion,

member 18+, content 18+, comments 18+

Nobody (or agency) can argue with that, dont see why it's an issue. Especially after what happened to Celebworld in 03

 

As far as the "in my country" goes, in parts of India girls marry at 11-12, so in that country would 12 be postable? The CIA world fact book says the average birthing age is 15, would that be ok then?


WTF, 18. Set it there, leave it there, ban the whiners.

 

I'm not aware of what happened. Care to elaborate?

 

I'm not gonna argue about it. I already have enough stress.