18+

Cayne likes the 16 and 17 year olds. The rule will never change because of that.

 

Am I the only one that wants to know what S-Type had for dinner?

 

:roll:
http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=1127248&p=7338507&viewfull=1#post7338507

 

So basically, phun will die without little 16 year olds in bikinis being posted. If thats true, I cant help but feel the desire to want to distance myself from this place. It was one thing when the celeb photos section changed from mostly nudie shit to the paparazzi wannabe site it has become (this place reminds me of tmz or justjared now.), but now we have become a place that can only be financially viable by posting pics of teens. How low phun has fallen.

 

just browse the entire fucking thread

http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=1127248

page 2&3 especially. They KNOW how old she is. They know it's an issue here, and they dont give a damn.

Tell you what. When phun gets its shit straight I'll be back. If it still exists. Good luck with your underage lawsuits, I'm done.

>< ...

 

I deleted my comment sorry for my wrong mistake PLEASE don't ban me!

 

You posted this last month so you knew her age. It wasn't a mistake you just don't give a fuck

http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=1122658&p=7321245&viewfull=1#post7321245

 

Yep, hes been given chance after chance and has consistently failed to show that he understands and accepts the rules. I have never called for a ban and I never will, but how long are we going to treat him like a shortbus kid that doesnt know any better? We have had a new wave of members and while its great to grow and have empty slots filled, a lot of them have their heads up their asses. Even worse is that it seems that phun is being handled in a way so as to appeal to and appease them. Anything that gets em in the door, right?

 

I agree I blew it,but come on everyone else was commenting on how sexy she is,please don't make me the only example,change the rues for everyone,I won't do it again!

 

You are campaigning to the wrong person. My name isnt in red. Your post is the exact issue i have with you. Time after time you admit that you blew it or were wrong. Always claiming you will never do it again. I really dont have tolerance for people like you. You do whatever the fuck you want to do and then try to hide behind this facade of being a total imbecile. Well, maybe you are and maybe you arent an imbecile. What I do know is that you have no regard for the rules here, no regard for common social courtesies and probably consider yourself to be quite clever in how you have gotten over around here.

As far as everyone else was doing it.... This is the prime example of YOU. A childish argument, which is to further the desire of your peers to treat you as a "special" case. I have this discussion with my 5 and 8 year old daughters. I will not do your fathers job, my plates full.

 

Good point. However, whether I click it or not, it exists at a place that I am associated with.

 

Kids are kids,let them grow up naturally without idiots like myself making horrible comments about them,let them grow into beautiful young ladies,without insenstive sexual commentary,so be patient,I know it is hard to tell the difference these days,but it is no excuse,so I hearby co-sign to change the policy 18 plus for our protection and their well-being and safety!

 

Thats fine. Are they filled with the type of comments found in that thread? Even if they are, is it acceptable? The rules as they stand now "In particular: Anybody making sexually explicit or suggestive remarks about children under the age of 16 will receive an instant ban! No warnings!" allows for sexually explicit or suggestive remarks about 16 year olds, as long as they refrain from "Referring to models and celebrities as sluts, whores, bitches, cunts, etc, is considered unwarranted and unacceptable vilification."