Bella Thorne - In a bikini on the beach in Malibu - 8/18/14

This girl in the rainbow striped bikini is hot, please tell me she is 18!

 

red bush!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Considering she's a natural blonde, that'd show quite the commitment to going red.

 

Considering she's sixteen, you guys should choose a different topic.

 

Rocketmember.

 

with Kaili Thorne

 

Hummmm... Me thinks the pics above was what they were saying not to post...somebody can't read....

 

The chick in the pink bikini is 8.

 

Give me a damn break. There's absolutely nothing wrong here. They never should have been taken down. They're all 16 or over. And who the hell cares if the other two are "minor" celebs, or are lacking an IMDB entry? This place is getting bloody ridiculous.

 

And they're all posted at every other celeb board I've been to. Nobody else has a problem with these.

 

Except the explanation makes no sense. Names were provided. So were ages. The post falls within the rules of the board, unless you're just making them up on the fly now.

 

It's because phunners are getting hornier and hornier. Mods need to step in before someone rapes someone in real life!

 

In that case, they should just raise the age limit to 18, and the problem goes away. Of course, so will many of the members. What's going on here, especially with this thread, is pretty damn stupid.

 

Its not because of the age of subjects, its the horniness levels. The levels are out of control lately due to so many hot posts and by taming it down it stops us from raping an innocent woman.

 

Well, I can see we've run into a bit of a muddled issue here so let me clarify the rule concerning 16+ in the Celebrity Section:

The celebrity must be 16+. In any images where it's possible that anyone else in the image is younger than 16, such individuals must not be the focus of the image. Or in other words, if there's a celeb in the picture but the focus of the image is directed at some 13 year old's ass, that would be a nono.

Such images are forbidden because, frankly, those of us with self-respect don't want to be reading pervo comments about such images, because this forum is for adults who act like adults.

As far as images of 16+ celebs engaged in activities with their young friends, if it can be verified that the friends in question meet the 16+ policy of phun, then it is OK to post them along with the celebrity. 16+ is 16+, no matter who the subject is, just so long as they are not naked.

So, in the future, if anyone posting images has any doubts whatsoever about whether or not the images they would like to post meet the 16+ policy of this forum, they would do well to take my simple advice and don't make assumptions, ask a mod first before posting. First and foremost, we are here to help, not hinder, if at all possible.

If you have any questions, feel free to PM me personally, my inbox is always open, and I will always help whenever I can.

 

Here are the redacted images, plus dupes, which I'm posting with RAM's assurances, under penalty of permaban (for RAM, not me) if they prove to be false.



(good thing I saved them, ay?)

 

Proof Bella Pendergast is 18:
https://twitter.com/bellapendergast/status/498563768654106625

Proof Olivia Grace is 16:
https://twitter.com/bellathorne/status/382554930805870593

Case closed.

 

I knew you knew.

Twitter accounts don't amount to much for people not registered on Twitter (which can be lied to anyway, just like any other website, including this one).

 

I do my research. :comp2:

 

True, but the sources are Bella Pendergast's Twitter and Bella Thorne's Twitter. I don't see any reason why either of them would lie about ages.