LEAKS Leaks Discussions Pt 2 (Read first post before posting in this thread)

While I personally can't, I could see the attraction in paying money for a celeb that is likely to either not leak, or not leak for a very long time if there's something nice there, if that's something you can afford.

And if I was able to do that, then after I'd gathered enough content where I didn't think there's much more for me to get, I'd leak it all because sharing is caring.

 

Amen.
Guys, if you don't mind to pay in order to get exclusive content, then use your money to support photographers, magazines or whoever creates content you think it's worth supporting.
To pay for leaks means giving money to very questionable people and receive stolen content in return, come on.

 

Yes the same content that we all want to see. Stolen content is difficult to obtain and therefore has economic value when we're lucky ... sometimes it doesn't even get sold.

It's always bad to give money to criminals, but how do you think the leaks came out?

 

The fact that it's all illegal means that honestly? People should take the names of sellers and pass them to the authorities.

We all want to see hot celebrities doing naughty things but the fact there are criminal incels hoarding this shit has me against them completely. Just leak everything that's out there without becoming complicit by buying this shit. None of these images or videos have any real value, anyway.

 

I hate hoarding just as much as anyone but they’re mostly the ones doing all the work and taking risks. And turn them in? Just… lol

 

The value is decided by the market, if anyone is willing to spend to see these photos that they might otherwise never see. There will always be a market. Who releases the photos is who buys them, not who gets them. P.S. No photos on 99% of celebrity sites are legal even those taken at events as they are stolen from photo agency sites.

 

And that's the problem.

There is ZERO VALUE in these because they're literally stolen from celebs. "The market" doesn't even get to decide, because they're ultimately worthless. Someone's paying 2k for nude photos of a tennis player, then putting them online for everyone else to see. There's no value in that, just one schmuck paying money to another schmuck and then putting them up for free anyway.

None of the women have value, either. An actress is one bad career move away from going from A-list star everyone knows to "I wonder what happened to her?", just like with the nude athletes who rely on being healthy to get top positions in their sport, or lose ranking.

Your attempted "gotcha" at the end about 99% of celeb sites also proves my point: None of this shit has value, so the people willingly paying, as well as the idiots hoarding them for cash, are just wasting everyone's time, here.

Just leak everything, move on and get more nudes to leak for free after, or do the opposite and sit on names forever until they're no longer famous. Those are really the only logical choices here.

Won't say any more because I've made my point and I'm waiting for Majesty to come in to remind everyone that we should be talking about tits instead of the cunts hoarding this bullshit.

 

NFT for me will always stand for "Non-Fuckable Twats", which is what those buying/selling actual NFTs or hacked nudes are. Just lonely incels with no brains spending money on useless things that people should have access to for free.

 

Plenty of the stuff posted here was paid for, or at least traded for (which is a form of payment) at one point. Once people get everything they want, some of those people will hoard, while others might be generous and share with the world.

 

Profoundly wish someone would scan & leak these Danielle Harris prints.

 

Y'all can spend your money however you like but at least jerk off first and then decide if it's still worth it.

Never buy groceries when you're hungry.

 

What's the legal difference between asking them for it and buying it?

 

The former is soliciting for illegal goods (nude images hacked from another person's phone), the other is outright purchasing stolen goods.

It's like how undercover vice officers can arrest potential clients of prostitutes (in areas where prostitution is illegal) for soliciting. They're only asking what the deal is but it's still them enquiring about an illegal activity.

ETA that it's why this forum removes content when they get DMCAs, to avoid further legal action from hosting and promoting stolen images.

 

That is a whole lot of words just to say that people have something you want and you are mad at them because they won't share.

 

Morality aside, I'd pay good money for more St. Vincent nudes. I know that was just part of someone else's set, but she's been on my wishlist for over a decade. I imagine some others also have that one person they want and would go for it if they saw a chance.

 

I am surprised more of these collectors trading/selling are never worried about accidentally doing it with a cop. Playing around with this stolen property will get these people in shit just as hard as any other criminal activity.

 

the last four pics in this post are indeed social media pics, posted on Selena's birthday a few days ago.

 

Is that first alleged Selena pic legit? I'd sure love to believe it but what has CSI Phun determined?

 

well the girl on the right does look a bit like Selena who knows