LEAKS Leaks Discussions Pt 2 (Read first post before posting in this thread)

Emily VanCamp or Keirnan Shipka please

 

I wonder how old those shipman leaks are because i feel like shes starting to look like a fake plastic barbie doll in her OF stuff.

 

1000000000% agreed. Judging by the hair I would say 2 years. She's been blonde or at least had highlights for about that long

 

i highly dout nude since out takes, but she has done acouple like that odd seethrough sweater. so it would just be nipples, mostly seethrough type. Like lauren cohan, have only heard of nipple out takes, no home made nudes by phone. That is what the main guy said atleast what he has seen and heard. He said if there is home made leaks he has not heard of any from both.

 

I'm still patiently waiting for those ariel winter leaks.... maybe not patiently. I would love to even see more previews. Has anyone heard anything?

 

With Ariel definitely have to be careful. I remember some pics/vids that couldn't be posted because even for those that were confirmed her were either confirmed or likely U18 Ariel.

One thing for certain if E cup or bigger than its definitely U18 Ariel. She mentioned having hers reduced to a D cup before she turned 18

 

yea me also, not sure why that guy feels he is a mod and constantly warns people, with info that everyone knows. he preaches 24/7 but still right there with the leaks and knows about all the ua stuff lol hmmmm ... kinda like walking by a murder scene while eating popcorn and tells the detectives, hey not sure iof you know but that guy is murdered, i dont know any info about it just wanted to let you know lol.......... but for info on ariel she was on alot of list, i forgot what but there was pics/vids, maybe someone saved those old list from good people, not random list. But she is always on list. im sure someone here saved some list. lol guess i should say the word list one more time for good measure lol i use to have them, the ones people with real info put out, but then it got flooded with fake list, so choose wisely bud

 

I wonder how many people still have this photo of Lucy Collett in their Ariel collection from ten years ago thinking it's really her.

Edit: Sorry for the link in the original, thought it was less intrusive than a thumbnail and didn't know the rule. Won't happen again.

 

There were so many fakes and “not-hers” going around, even before the leaks got out. Somebody gave me a couple claiming to be Taylor Swift in the locker room at a gym. Super grainy, but you could see the woman’s face and it clearly wasn’t Taytay.

 

i was hoping for info about the rumored chelsea rebecca set.rachel bloom had shown pasties on her boobs at a live show years ago. she's on my wish list.

 

The Georgia Ellenwood leak selfie is epic. Where there ever any rumors of more than just one pic?

 

Thanks to the guy who posted it! I heard more about her getting her boobs sucked and another nude selfie or two. Plus lingerie set

 

theres like 40 pics allegedly

 

If you ever went to other forums you'd have seen more. There's 49 pics and 4 vids in her set.

Question for the moderators and sorry if this has been addressed before: Why is every leak thread immediately closed after a leak. They used to be some of the most active threads in the past but now they are just getting passed down the pages and a lot of people who aren't here every other day may not see them because there's so many posts in the extra section. Also, I don't want to bother one of you mods every time I feel foolish enough to add some leaks to a thread just to have it re-opened. Thank you.

 

I think it’s because every thread becomes nine pages of talk, wish-lists, and begging for more.

 

Very much this. If you don't check every day then it could be pages deep. And if you want to say anything it goes in the discussion thread which is a haphazard mess of people talking about different things at the same time.

 

Per the mandate for this thread as posted by Mods:

"Tired of the leak threads going pages and pages for 2 or 3 pics. Its pointless and misleading to see a thread bumped over and over with nothing new."

(Back when I used to work here), we did it to consolidate threads so that the actual content would be easily found within the thread itself, and to keep random 'thanks' messages and comments from people who did not use the thanks button, from continually notifying those who had the thread under Watched status. Nothing more annoying than getting notified by annoyances.

That mandate hasn't changed substantively since it was first instituted.

Also the usual CSI 'nipple/not a nipple' discussions that invariably occur are extremely tiring

---------

Posting adds with a quick message to merge them with existing threads takes only a moment and isn't too onerous a process to keep all the content together, compared to the alternative pros and cons

As you may've noticed, those open threads before being merged can still garner several random responses from people, which the Mods then have to delete before merging. That's what they love - viewers creating more work for themselves they deserve a little appreciation for what we put them through

 

Thanks for the clarification. So, open a new thread and give a mod the link to the original thread and the new one and ask them to merge?