Emma Watson - the Today Show in New York 11-16-10 very LQ tags

She looks gorgeous, glorious, and sexy, just as she always did.

The online forums are full of guys who must be baffled by all the pictures of naked women, since the only indication of gender they can comprehend is hair-length.

Look at it as evolution in action: They're thinning themselves out of the herd.

 

Yes, I honestly don't understand how some guys can only associate femininity with long hair.

 

Cause most women with hair like that are carpet munchers.

 

It doesn't help that she has an androgynous face. Since that's the way she looks, long hair adds to the feminine side short hair the masculine. I can appreciate her body but it's in spite of her face.

 

I will throw in my opinion. I think she is a very pretty girl

 

gorgeous

 

If you think that face is androgynous, I fear for your ability to recognize a female.

 

Maybe when with short hair, they look like a guy with tits...

:smashfreakB:

 

Saness fills my heart

 

I never said she didn't look female. She looks female, barely.

 

If something that sumptuously gorgeous "barely" sets off your female detectors, your genome is in danger of extinction.

 

Agreed.... time to turn in you "man card" if your radar is off that much.

 

I think she looks ridiculously hot. She's an extremely cute girl who has developed one hell of a body which I think she very much enjoys showing off. Can't remember the last time such a conservative outfit looked that sexy.

 

If you think she looks "sumptuously gorgeous" then I fear for any young boys in your vicinity. You probably have hard to explain feelings for Justin Bieber.

 

how bout taking the childish, bullshit banter and going elsewhere instead of hijacking somebodies thread with it....Merry Christmas!

 

If that is addressed to me you may wish to review this thread, and my original post, and reassess your opinions on what is actually going on here. Nice try, though.

Seasons greetings.

 

Ohh Emma looks super cute in these pics, thanks!

 

You do realize you've long since been shouted down by a truly overwhelming majority, right? Look, I'm sorry you're so gender-confused that you can't tell an elegantly beautiful woman is female unless her hair is long. It's sad for you. Maybe one day medical science can help you. In the meantime, though, while nobody can give you the ability to discern a woman when one's in front of you, you can protect yourself from ridicule and scorn. Just know when to hide your disability, that's all.

 

Is every Emma thread gonna disintegrate into this? Truth be told, I wasn't a huge fan of the haircut, but I'm not going to post discontent in all the threads that feature her with short hair. If you've made your opinion on the subject clear before, do you really need to do it again and accuse every Emma liker of liking teenage boys? Let it go, click the 'x' on the top corner of the screen if the pics aren't to your liking.

 

IF THESE ARE TOO MANY WORDS IN ONE PLACE FOR YOU, I CAN SUM IT UP: I'M RIGHT.

Actually, it seems to me half the people in these threads agree with me. But I guess you see what you want to see. And you keep saying I cannot tell a female because of hair. Quote me on it. Do it!

I said short hair was more masculine and it is. I don't know what culture you come from if you think hair like that is associated mainly with females. But I have found chicks feminine and attractive with such hairstyles. Emily Browning and Natalie Portman, as cases in point, still looked feminine - but it was in spite of their hair. And it was because of their beautiful feminine faces. Emma Watson's short hair highlights her androgynous face. Her face would not be totally out of place on a boy of the same age but it would look feminine. Just like on her it looks masculine. It's androgynous. I never said it was a bad thing but I don't find it attractive - at least not coupled with the boyish hair as well.

And why should I not post in this thread? Are they only for one set of agreeing opinions on the subject matter? What would someone be doing past the first page, in such a case? Since you would already know everyone loves whatever and whoever is posted, all the time, no dissenting voices. Unless they wanted to hear all the (hypothetical) voices that blindly echoed theirs, for some sort of sad self-esteem boost. I came in here supporting the other voices with similar opinions to mine and reasoned my case clearly and politely. It's then I get attacked with faux-intelligent insults and replies (which only highlight their lack of intelligence, and wit). Although I find this shit tiring (I only wanted to state my opinion), I wont let (repeated) insults stand or let the ignorant have the last word.