Just so you know...

I'm going to start taking a very active interest in the AMA Forum vis-a-vis underage nudes. If I (the emphasis being on my opinion) have any doubts about the age of any girls portrayed in a post I'm going to delete the entire post even if it's just one pic that I find questionable. 5 or more such posts in the space of 5 pages and I'll be handing out warnings and infractions. Continued defiance and I will be closing threads. The practice of posting naked 13 - 17 year olds must stop. So fair warning.

My primary mandate as a mod is to monitor content and look out for the best interests of the website as a whole. So if you have any doubts about the age of the girls you're posting, chances are I will too. And know this: I don't have to prove they're underage, I just have to assume it. So if you're an active contributor to this forum (and would like to continue being as such) you may want to stop posting girls and start posting women instead.

~scribe



Thank this post if you understand where I'm coming from.

 

I so agree with you

The trend is becoming bad now

Thanx for taking the stance

 

well done i suppose but a pit ironic considering some of the thread titles we glaze over with ease

as youve heard me spout about before,

the tittles of the threads read
young teen
and more or less stuff like that
kinda odd really.

here is a few examples.

[HF] Sweet ex-girlfriend undresses and Best of Teens!
Amateur Teen Bikini - Simply Delicious!
Naked Amateurs - Young/Nude and HOT
Hot Teens / Mirror Girls
Teen Photos
[DF] Amazing Amateur Teens (cute_n_sexy)
very nice teen

thats an example for the first page of this forum
but then
Im sure they mean 18 and 19 eh?

 

Teens with clothes on, - those 16+ at any rate - even bikinis, I really don't have a problem with. I can walk down to the beach and see that in public. This should in no way be considered a tacit nod to lascivious pederasty though. Like I said in the OP, if I (or anyone on staff) have an issue with an image we are empowered to delete it/them/all of the above.

As for the thread titles, provocative sells. I'm not going to take censorship that far. It may be worth discussing though.

Thoughts?

 

Well fucking said!!!

 

I agree

NAKED pornographic images are not on

The fact that they strip down and partake in sexual acts willingly and allow themselves to be photographed or filmed, does in no way make it legal. If we want to keep enjoying the thread, lets keep it legal.

We should also not be perceived as people who condone this shit.

Thanks again

 

I LOVE PUSSY.

but I love my own arse hole more.

I can't see myself giving up my arse hole in prison for some male to use as a pussy.

So come on guys. Put a stop to this crap.

MILFs taste better anyway

 

tell me you at least see the ironic side of this mess.

 

Of course I do, I'm not ignorant.


I'm willing to see if people start getting the message. If not, then maybe we'll get Draconian about it.

 

HUH?? Don't have a clue what that means, but I don't like no kiddie shit! Good call.

 

I'm all for erring on the side of caution, so deleting anything you suspect is a-okay with me (Although maybe you should tell the OP which picture so they can repost the others without getting them deleted over and over again). That said, here's my question: Have any of the pictures people have been complaining about actually been proven to be underage? Again, I'm all for being careful, but some of the girls people have been so convinced are under 18 look older than women I know who are in their late-20s. Do we have any actual confirmation that any of these girls are under 18?

 

It's impossible to prove the age of any of them. And for the record I'd like to add that I'm not singling out pics arbitrarily. I give suspect images alot of consideration before deciding whether or not to delete them based on my 30+ years of personal, intimate experience with (at first) girls and women both.

As for informing the OP which post got tanked I tell you this: Stop putting more than 10 or 15 random pics in a post and I won't have to delete the whole lot. I'm not going to count pics in a 40 pic post just to get at the one that concerns me.

 

Not that I'm much more than a lurker, but it sounds good. Besides, losing one or two pics (or thread) out of 40 isn't going to break the (sperm) bank.

 

Excellent.

 

This can only be good news, i kind of assumed this kind of thing was well moderated anyway. Im glad you are taking it upon yourself to clamp down on this. Thank you

 

Given the way the US law phrases the term pornography I think we should still make everything 18+ in the amateur section. Better be safe than sorry. :2cent:

 

I absolutely agree.

 

I think you're spot on, and this is a good idea in general. So many times I've seen girls posted here who are so obviously underage and no one even seemed to question it. I'm sorry, but if I see a young girl with braces on her teeth, with her top off, I'm assuming that's some illegal shit right there. Maybe not for everyone everywhere, but for many.

Good on ya, J3scribe.

 

100% agree. It's not a turn-on seeing a small girl with braces, and barely any physical development. It's kinda gross actually, so being 18+ is a good idea.

 

Additionally you have lots of amateurs doing mirror shots too and they should be 18+. Too many girls and lots of overlapping going on. Even with bikinis on they should be 18+. :2cent: