Ariana Grande (Sideboob & Leggy) & Elizabeth Gillies (Bra & Downblouse) - Bathroom Video (2009) Caps

Ariana Grande sideboob:


Ariana Grande leggy in shorts:


Elizabeth Gillies bra + tank top:


Elizabeth Gillies downblouse:


Elizabeth Gillies stretching and lying on ground:


Ariana Grande tongue:


Ariana Grande and Elizabeth Gillies looking like they're sucking on things:


Ariana Grande feet + cute smile:


Video:


Search: Liz

 

Nothin like a couple of 12 year olds romping around in the bathroom.

 

Ariana said in her live chat the other day that this video is from 2009. She also has red hair, which means the earliest it can be from is October 2009 (that's when she first dyed her hair red), so both of them are at least 16-years-old in this video.

 

First, ew. How the hell do you know she died her hair in October of 2009?

Second, 16 isn't far enough away from 12 to be any better than 12. Just my opinion. I mean, you're, what, 30-something? Why don't you look at some women? You spend an awful lot of time on kids.

 

We are all entitled to our opinions and shitting on the subject matter is more than fair game. However taking personal shots at someone that contributes actual content is not looked kindly upon in these parts. You don't like looking at 16 yr old girls, that's fine, want to comment about that fact, I'll support you in every way. Don't attack the poster.

 

I apologize. I wasn't trying to attack him, I was asking what I thought to be a legitimate question.

 

First, there's a video on her YouTube channel uploaded on October 5, 2009 titled "Ariana says goodbye to her brown hair!!!!!! :]" and in it, she says she's dying her hair in three days. All it took was a simple search.

Second, there is a HUGE difference between 16-years-old and 12-years-old. Plus, 16-years-old is the age limit of this forum and the legal age of consent in most states in the United States.

Third, not that it's any of your business how old I am, but for the record, I'm 23-years-old. And what celebrities I choose to like and look at is my business. I'm not hurting anyone. Just because the younger celebrities aren't your preference, don't come in here and try to ruin it for the rest of us.

 

Struck me as a bit stalkerish, is all.

As an adult, I have no interest in children. A 16 year old is a child. I don't particularly care if a state laws agrees with me or not. While it may the legal age of consent, good luck taking a nude picture or filming an act featuring that consent with someone that young. Just saying.

It's your business until you decide to share it with us. Then it's our business. I happen to find it gross that grown-ass men are so obsessed with girls this young, and I have ever right to say so. And the experience would only be ruined if you happen to think that there's some truth in what I say. Otherwise I'm so much white noise.

 

I never said I'd do anything with a girl younger than 18-years-old. I was just stating the law to back up my case that there is a huge difference between 16-years-old and 12-years-old. And for arguments sake, even if I ever did decide to do something with a girl younger than 18-years-old, I'd never take pictures or videos of it. That's child porn and I'm against that. But like I said, I'm not hurting anyone by looking and commenting on celebrity girls under 18-years-old. It's not like I can reach through my screen and sexually harass them.

What I meant by it's my business who I like is I'm allowed to like whoever I want and shouldn't be wrongfully judged based off of it. Just because you may not like a certain young celebrity, doesn't mean others don't or shouldn't, and it doesn't mean others should refrain from posting threads about sed girls just because it's gross in your opinion.

If you find grown men talking about girls under 18-years-old gross, why did you even open this thread? It was clearly stated in the thread's title that this video is from 2009, which would make both Ariana and Elizabeth under 18-years-old.

By the way, I find it hilarious you said...

Are you forgetting you also said this a few days ago?...

McKayla Maroney is 16-years-old. Great job being a hypocrite.

Look, I'm not saying people should never post negative comments or that you're not entitled to your opinion, but there's a difference between a legitamite negative comment and a snide negative comment posted just to get a rise out of people.

 

I think the kids call this pownage

 

Right, you just make them the focus of your posts.

But you just made a case that they're not children "because 16 is the legal age of consent in most of the country." Now you're admitting that it's child porn to film those consensual acts? Dude, make up your mind.

And no, there isn't a huge difference between 16 and 12. Not enough for me to not be skeeved out about it. At least an 18 or 19 year old is probably out of high school and worrying about adult things and has had some life experience. At 16, that's usually not the case.

Never said you were. I simply said I found your fixation on young girls to be a bit troubling. I'm entitled to that opinion.

No, it doesn't mean you should refrain from posting (I actually really like most of your posts, just not the ones with the kids in them). But it also doesn't mean you should be free from being judged. That's not part of the deal. I'm gonna judge you, and others are gonna judge you. Just like people are gonna judge me. I don't think I should be immune to that. After all, I speak my mind, so I'm setting myself up to be judged. That's the price of participation.

I am only vaguely aware of who Ariana Grande is, and I have no idea who her friend is, nor the age of either of them, now or in the pictures. I entered the thread because you post quality content, and I usually make sure to check out your posts. When I saw that these were basically babies taking pics of themselves, I got a little creeped out.

By the way, I find it hilarious you said...


Are you forgetting you also said this a few days ago?...

McKayla Maroney is 16-years-old. Great job being a hypocrite.
[/quote]

I had no idea she was that young. For some reason I thought she was 20. I even almost replied to a poster in one of those threads who hoped she would show up at the next Olympics that there was no way a 24-year-old gymnast would compete.

I'm not particularly concerned with who gets a rise out of me. I made the comment to show my disgust with the post, that's all. It wasn't a direct knock on you, and your feelings aren't my responsibility. But if it makes you feel better, I wasn't commenting on you. I could care less what you do with yourself. I just feel creepy sharing a forum with girls who are that young.

 

Whatever age they are in this video, or whatever like or dislike people have about it, what they are doing is sexual in nature and they know it. Females are getting younger and younger in their attempts to get young males to notice them. I see it everyday IRL.

AHT: You sure do have a lot of strong opinions about photos on this board. Many of your comments are rude in nature IMO. If there was an IGNORE POSTER choice here you would be Number One on my list to ignore.

 

I wouldn't try the defence of I didn't know she was that young in court. Won't work...

 

In response to Alyson Hannigan's Tampon's last post:

1. Yes.

2. Like I said, 16-years-old is the legal age of consent. So with their consent, you can technically have sex with them. Not saying I would. I'm just saying I technically could. However, if you take pictures or videos, that's child pornography. Don't hate on me. It's the law's logic. And there is a difference between 16-years-old and 12-years-old. 16-years-old may still be underage, but at least they're mostly developed and sexually active. Most 12-year-olds are just starting puberty. Some not even yet.

3. Fair enough, but you didn't have to make assumptions about me.

4. Maybe I should've worded it differently. I just wish you wouldn't have jumped to conclusions about me. You assumed, or at least implied, that I was some 30-something-year-old creep.

5. Fair enough.

6. I can't prove that you did or didn't know, but even if you didn't, you still found her attractive based on the "Am I dreaming" part of the comment. Hope that's fair to say.

7. Never said it was your responsibility. I just wish you would go about posting your comments differently sometimes. They can come off very sarcastic and snide, and if I'm not mistaken, you've been getting into some arguments lately because of that? Why keep posting comments like that, that you know might rub others the wrong way? Again, I know freedom of speech, but you could've also simply opened this thread and commented, "Eh, they look too young for me here," and there would've been no backlash whatsoever. You didn't have to make the 12-year-old comment and then make assumptions about me when all I did was simply explain to you how I figured out the year the video was taken and their ages in it.

Anyway, whether you respond to this or not, I'm done going back and fourth with you. This thread was supposed to be about Ariana and Elizabeth and now it's cluttered with our conversation. By the way, just so we're clear, I'm not mad and I'm not going to hold a grudge or anything. I just had to say what I had to say.

 

not chiming in on either side, just thought this was relevant

http://youtu.be/75XKGVwGEt4?t=40s

 

RAMistheMAN............just don't bother replying to "Alyson Hannigan's Tampon." He just sounds like a big ass troll

 

oh Internet :roll:



thanks for Liz

 

where is part 2 where they make out?

 

Good posts, RAM! They are hotties!