Olivia Munn - leggy, at her New York Hotel (7-8-13)MQ tags

You know..the mods here are completely fucking ass backward. Make it a goddamn rule to smudge out kids' faces and you wont have any problems with *"pervs". Instead you want to look for reasons to ban people, or hand out infractions, seemingly out of spite. So now this little girl has her image posted on a sick porn board, WHICH IS WHAT THIS MESSAGE BOARD IS, and instead of being up in arms over this invasion of a child's privacy, in this case, Olivia Munn's niece, you go out of your way to let everyone know that these starlets we post are not sluts, whores, bitches, or anything else 99% of men think to themselves in a sexual way, not necessarily to demean.

I don't care if I get in trouble for saying this, fucking make it a goddamn rule to mark out the faces of minors on this goddamn site. Use your fucking heads and stop worrying about whether or not Selena Gomez's angelic reputation is besmirched within the confines of this message board because we all know shes going to come here and read that someone said he wants to suck her asshole, something her sweet innocent ears haven't heard every week since she started junior high.

*attraction to a 16 yr old girl, or 15 yr old girl, or any girl with curves, tits, a bush, and menstruates is not pedophilia. It's Ephebophilia And smudging out the faces and bodies of these minors would solve both problems with posting paparazzi candids. You're welcome.

 

Olivia looks nice as always!

 

Mate, I didn't even notice the kid until I read your post.

I'm a fully grown man and my eyes were only drawn to the very attractive dark haired woman. I felt no offense at the kid even after you pointed it out. I was in town after work today and I am sure tehre were plenty of kids in town, didn't actually take the time to look at any of them.

The mods have made a rule and since they did no idiots have commented sexually about kids. It was a resolved issue until you posted.

 

#1 My issue is with the privacy of the children. If any of you see no problem with this, then there's something wrong with you.

#2 There was never a problem with sexual comments directed at children, because a 15 yr old girl is not a child. A child is a human being who has yet to sexually mature.

 

you went through this post:
http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=1128158
if you watch porn of 18 years.

 

Guys guys guys. Let's not lose our focus here. We have one of the prettiest women on the planet in this post and instead of discussing how pretty she is and spending our time enjoying wank her amazing body and face we speak about a kid somewhere in the background..

Don't get me wrong the kid should have been covered, but who is going to notice anybody other than Olivia in the picture? And I feel people into that kind of stuff won't be coming to our forum to satisfy their needs.

So lets calm down and worship our queen!

 

Incredibly gorgeous and sexy! :1luvu: Such sexy legs! :32:

 

The problem isn't the images. It's not even the age of the kids in the images. The problem is the idiots who comment like asshats on the images of younger teens, and the nitwits who think everyone finds it acceptable to vilify women with derogatory terms such as slut and whore. If you expect me to believe that you can get away with saying that to every woman you meet, and expect to have any kind of further relaltions with them that doesn't involve pepper spray, I'd say your full of shit, as would 99% of the members here.

So guess what? We raised the standards of conduct, especially in the Celeb Section. If you or anyone else has a problem with that, your future at phun will be a difficult one, or very brief, depending. The choice is up to you.

 

the 18+ Poll has been removed from the Lounge

why?

 

Yup, the thread of the day it is indeed.

 

Cant say I disagree with the pedo rager. I always try to make it a point to pixelate underage kids on my postings, but thats me.