Chloe Moretz Seen at Bibigo Bar & Dining in Century City January 30-2015 x6 MixQ

cutie! this photog is really rude and annoying though. getting within a few feet of someone eating in a dim lit location and using a flash?

 

This pap should've had noodles thrown in his face.

Bloody cheek while somebody is eating in a restaurant.

 

we can be as disgusted as we want by the paps behavior but it doesnt change the fact that the market decides what is acceptable or not. So rude or not unless we stop clicking on threads like this and look at the pics more shit like this will surface.

No offence meant Bartek.

 

Is now times Dopey the store is open to the public

 

Wow what an asshole paparazzi!!

 

Yeah, there`s a lot of rude people in the world, and some of them have cameras. What an asshole.

 

I doubt it was paparazzi. I also like the little wood box under her plate.

 

hah, this is probably the first time I feel genuinely pissed about a paparazzi.
and yet I've had absolutely noooo problem wanking to the fappening, and the method of acquiring those pictures was way more despicable

 

How many stars are so aggravated by the pap's constant badgering that they switch careers? NONE. It goes with the territory...

 

Allright everyone, you heard it: BE ASSHOLES TO EACHOTHER! If they don't like it, they should change THEIR lives!
Great advice.

 

lol I think you're assuming we have far more influence than we do. Photogs aren't hired for their images to be used in forums like phun. If that was the case there wouldn't be any money to pay them. There's nothing we can do about it...private businesses/and city governments just need to start cracking down on intrusions of privacy and harassment in certain places.

 

Love the "What the Hell," look on her face.

 

Is that her brother she's with?

 

Yeah, it's her brother Colin.

 

I had a think, and I think if I was a celeb at her level, I would be used to Paps everywhere in any "public" place

Her home would be a line-drawer

 

This restaurant is inside a mall...do paparazzi rules still apply?

Forums like this are just a tiny drop in the bucket. Unless magazines like People, US Weekly, Star, In Touch and all of the other magazines stop buying the photos, the paparazzi will keep on snapping.

It's two-sided though. Celebrities aren't needing to do publicity 24/7....if you're an established actor, no one is forcing you to live in West LA or the trendiest areas of NY, dine at the newest/trendiest restaurants where you know papparazzi are swarming, hit the most popular flavor-of-the-month clubs/bars that are known celeb hangouts, work out at the newest/hottest Soul Cycle gym..etc.. These people choose to live/play in the most heavily paparazzi areas. If you notice, you'll see the same names repeatedly pop up on the forums on a daily basis...these celebrities know exactly what Miami beaches to go to or where to shop to be seen.

Do a title search on Shailene Woodley for example...95% of picture threads are her at premiers, magazine shoots, or other publicity type events. How is that someone as popular as her can sneak under the radar so well but so many other celebrities are pictured every day? Simple, you don't go the hugely popular areas. When you go hiking in LA, you go off the beaten path...not the same Runyon Canyon where you know full well it's celebrity/paparazzi central and then complain you're not getting privacy (while happening to wear make-up, fashionable/brand new matching work-out cloths and running shoes).

I don't feel the least bit sad about celebrities. There is a big reason why we have pages and pages of the same names where you can practically document their day-to-day activity yet many other popular celebs can *somehow* manage to stay off the radar.

 

I would say they are a non-existent drop, because obviously nobody sells his photos to celeb fap sites...