Kate Upton - 'Zero Gravity' photoshoot for Sports Illustrated (+2 GIFs)

is it just me....or does that look like a nip slip???

 

Yeah, it's a shame. We did get to see her and others nude, etc. but there was a price paid by some. And who knows what we won't see.

 

you mean the shadows of the droplets that are all over her body?
yes, all of those are nip-slips.
genius.

 

These pics are outdated!

 

'Bout the only thing that will keep them from sagging some years from now...

 

Nothing suggestive about that last pic where she handles the nose cone of that flying phallic symbol.


Personally, I have a problem with the hypocrisy of women who sell the image of their sexuality for monetary compensation, striking suggestive poses, going almost entirely (or entirely) naked but covering up just enough to be able to say that they weren't doing nudie photos then get upset when true nudes show up. It's a choice they made to use their looks and bodies to lure men (mostly) to open their wallets and provide these ladies with a way to make a living and they are surely aware how they provoke the carnal lust in us men when they do so. It's only natural that we would want to see more and when we occasionally do, they get all pissed off about it. I know some of you will disagree but it doesn't seem to me that they have the right to complain.
:soapbox:

 

hey genius!...look past the shadows of the droplets!...blow the pic up and really look!...im not talking about the droplets or even the shadows of the droplets!!!...DUH!!!!!!

 

I believe I see it! Good eye.

 

nope, not there, just the wishful thinking of an idiot

 

Show them titties....

 

Did she retire at 22 or 23 from Sports Illustrated!?!!? Why not in 2015 issue!?!? Don't get!?!?

 

I don't think you understand the concept of hypocrisy. A woman has every right to use her body however she sees fit. If people are willing to pay her to see it, so be it. Supply and demand. That doesn't give others the right to do whatever they want with another person's body, or use it to profit themselves without consent, any more than a movie bootlegger would accuse a film studio of being hypocrites since they want to capitalize off the showing of the film. The point is that it belongs to the other person, not you. No hypocrisy applies.

 

Well stated. I agree with most of it, but a part of me still believes that they understand that playing with fire can get them burnt.