---Kari Sweets: "Sexy Back" (b/w)---

here's some kari black & whites...hope you like!!

rawwr!






hmm, now what?






:wink:






hyeah:






sexy back...

 

Kari is simply the cutest, sexiest, most erotic-looking girl currently still in the NN world...fabulous pics Felix! Thanks!

 

thanks joseph, glad you appreciate what she offers!!

alot of guys just wanna bitch that she doesnt get naked, but thats not her thing...but there's plenty of other girls that do so they should just move on and leave kari for those that appreciate her style of photos !!

 

well, i wouldn't bitch IF she got naked...but I sure appreciate what she....offers....

 

I was sold on the first pic.

 

Color pictures or black and white pics, with Kari it's all good.

 

Kari is probably the hottest, cutest, sexiest NN girl around. When I see her, the only thing I can say is WOW.
Thanks for posting felix

 

Kari definitely brings Sweets to the table. Those covers look a lot like reese's cup holders that needed a little licking to help stick.

 

Well I'll admit that I'm one of the "get naked" brigade, but I do appreciate her sets, this one is awesome.

 

I look forward to seeing Kari posts. She is such a tease. Looking hot as always. Nice pics.

 

I'm a great admirer of her nn stuff but look forward to the day when we see her naked doing repugnant things with small animals...
Nice post btw

 

I think I just died.

 

Felix, Kari's definitely one of the hottest girls on the net. Was a big fan for a long time even though she never showed the goods. Her poses and teasing were so close to be tantalizingly irresitable.

Completely lost interest when she started getting more daring but all the shots that should have tastefully shown mere glimpses of a little bit more had been carefully photoshopped to remove all traces.

Now I have this picture in my head of Kari as some sort of androgynous genderless freak.

I don't need spread eagled legs and close up pussy shots, I accept that's not Kari in any way (but I probably wouldn't complain ) just don't erase the truth.

 

god damn. she's so cute/hot

 

i lurk on alot of forums, and i read the complaints....i know you guys think i photoshop out her hoo-hoo lips, but i swear thats not true (no, she's not a barbie doll down there either, lol!!)

for example, look at this picture:




i see pics like that (and others where her panties are fully down) posted and talked about, and guys bitch at me for photoshopping her good stuff away...but the TRUTH is its all about the angle of the photo, not because of any erasing

next time you see a pic with her panties that far down, what you're seeing is whats REALLY there, no photoshopping away

 

what an amazing post, KARI is very sexy, and the first b & w sets are very erotic...thx

 

I LOVE this young lady!!!! She embodies the whole 'girl next door' look and has one of the sexiest bodies around. Thanks for the post.

 

Wow. You must think we're all a bunch of real idiots to believe a blatant lie like that. You may play with the angles in most shots, but I've seen a few shots that are clearly edited. There are people on this board that make their living with photoshop and can spot a blur or burn instantly.

I present the following photo as evidence. The only modification I made was to increase the gamma to make the editing more obvious:


Understand that even if you're not doing it the majority of the time, all it takes is a few edited photos for us to expect any slips in the future will also be edited.

 

Felix as you say I accept that most of it is careful posing and angling but as Bodolza states you must think we were born yesterday.

Nice example Bodolza.

May I present Exhibit No. 2. Completely unedited?



I don't believe the angle here can be debated. I accept that the focus is on the top of her body and that the object in question is in a certain amount of shadow but I truly don't believe that either of these factors are enough to explain the loss of definition seen here without post editing.

 

if you go back to page 1 and read what i said, you'll see i posted a "construction" pic with her panties pulled down, and i proceeded to say "pics like that"... i was talking about pictures from the front where u would expect to see some lips but none are there

example #1: edited
example #2: straight off the camera, COMPLETELY undedited....example 2 was shot w/o lights, so i had a really wide aperature (f4) to shoot it....with the focus on her face, it made from her stomach down an out-of-focus blur

there's also another picture from the same set as example # 2, where her panties are completely off and somewhere down by her knees...many ppl think those are photoshopped, but notice where the camera's shooting from and pay attention to her body posture - 100% unphotoshopped



it kind of makes me laugh, cause its like it's a bunch of teen boys who've never seen a pussy in real life, debating about whether her pussy's been photoshopped!...i think if alot guys spent more time with a real woman instead of messing with the pics in photoshop & spending hours analyzing them, they'd realize the error of their ways