Arianny Celeste - by Marya Gullo for PB [MQ]

​

 

....not nude for Playboy.....fail!

 

Technically, playboy.com. It's not the same site as playboyplus.com, home of the naked women.

 

If thats Playboy Hef mus be dead.

 

Shouldn't matter. This is Playboy's new model. They get women who are "celebs" or popular models to pose for them now and file it under "Playboy" to draw clicks and page views and the models/celebs are more willing to do it because it teases men as they promote it. They say they "shot for Playboy" you think nude and then it's not.

In this instance, it's double pathetic since Arianny has already done a nude shoot and they couldn't get her to go nude again.

The whole thing is sad, really. Playboy is about nudity. If a model/celeb doesn't want to go nude in a photoshoot they can go to a number of other publications that will do hot clothed shoots, but stay away from Playboy.

 

I hope she's not running around telling everybody she's in pb because it is a major disappointment, what else can she do? Act, sing, dance, write, paint, excel at a sport? All she has is her face ass and tits.

 

When they shot this, she did. This was done several months ago. Arianny and Playboy both tweeted about it and snapchatted it with simply saying "Look who's back shooting for Playboy"... like I said, really teasing it and getting guys interested.

Then it's this. Same exact thing happened for Abigail Ratchford. She teased the heck out of it, including doing a brief interview with TMZ and her shoot was far worse than this one.

I canceled my subscription to Playboy shortly after in protest. Not that 1 cancellation matters much, but if others do, maybe they get the message that this isn't cool.

 

She does a good job at looking pretty (useless) on Overhaulin'.