Jennifer Aniston Bikini on Vacation in Mexico - Nov 12 (x4 Blurry MQ), adds - The phun.org forum

Wingz · 11-13-2009, 05:54 PM

dgenerate · 11-13-2009, 06:12 PM

Yay, Jen's on holiday again.

*Keeps fingers crossed for more bikini pics to come*

haydaddict · 11-13-2009, 07:11 PM

Why do they look familiar?

Redwing1 · 11-13-2009, 07:22 PM

Yes ...They do look familiar ..

Salty Longshanks · 11-13-2009, 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by haydaddict

Why do they look familiar?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redwing1

Yes ...They do look familiar ..

They look familiar because "her personal pap" without fail, takes nothing but sloppy shots of her when she's in a bikini in Mexico.

Cagliostro · 11-13-2009, 08:38 PM

LQ adds

BiggusLaddus · 11-13-2009, 09:07 PM

Let's hope for some cracking nip shots.

JoshuaCalvert · 11-13-2009, 09:24 PM

I always love it when Jen goes on vacation and hits the beach !

Those paparazzi should get their heads out of their asses and start getting some HD videos and Super Ultra High Quality bikini pics.

Babes R Us · 11-13-2009, 09:36 PM

Ultraviolet · 11-13-2009, 11:36 PM

This Pap is hopeless - busted on the first day.

Obama is a status · 11-13-2009, 11:48 PM

Blurry is about right.

gronsak · 11-14-2009, 02:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoshuaCalvert

Those paparazzi should get their heads out of their asses and start getting some HD videos and Super Ultra High Quality bikini pics.

Interestingly, the EXIF data on the images in the first post hasn't been stripped. They were taken with a Canon 1DMkIII at a focal length of 700mm. The most likely way to get to 700mm is with a Canon 500mm f/4 IS with a 1.4x teleconverter - lens and camera together are about $10k worth of gear.

700mm focal length on the APS-H size sensor in the 1DMkIII translates to approximately 1.5 degrees vertical field of vision. The vertical resolution of the 1DMkIII is 2592 pixels. Unless I'm badly mistaken, the 3rd picture in the OP is what's call a "100% crop", or actual pixels from the image taken without any resizing. That file is 627 pixels high, or 24% of the height of the picture taken, which comes to 0.36 degrees. Estimating the height of the picture at 5' and using a little trigonometry, we get a photographer who's roughly 800' from Jen. If the third image has been resized to be larger than original, as the fourth clearly has been, then the photographer is even further away.

800' is a really freaking long way away from a person to take a picture of them. Try it yourself if you don't believe me.

The second batch of pictures under the umbrella were taken with a Canon 5DMkII at a focal length of 1120mm, which places that photographer even further away.

All that said, that's some ridiculous camera shake-induced blur in that shot. Dude needs to use a monopod instead of trying to handhold that giant-ass telephoto lens.

dirtycash · 11-14-2009, 02:23 AM

gronsak · 11-14-2009, 02:24 AM

btw it's entirely likely I fucked up the math somewhere along the way there.... general point stands, though. The pictures are crap cuz the pap can't get close enough, not because they're using lousy cameras.

Salty Longshanks · 11-14-2009, 02:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gronsak

btw it's entirely likely I fucked up the math somewhere along the way there.... general point stands, though. The pictures are crap cuz the pap can't get close enough, not because they're using lousy cameras.

Thanks for the input/lesson gronsak. You appear to be quite knowledgeable with all things photographic. Look at any of the Mexican bikini/vacation threads of her here. We get ultra clarity on all the other hens in their bikini snaps, but everything Jen is grainy, and shait. Conspiracy?

Just pisses me off.

I love this woman, and could take a better picture of her in Mexico from here in Maine ffs.

11-13-2009, 05:54 PM	#1
Wingz Oh Noes!! Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 9,857 Thanks: 12,806 Thanked 142,100 Times in 7,620 Posts	Jennifer Aniston Bikini on Vacation in Mexico - Nov 12 (x4 Blurry MQ), adds __________________ Blake Lively by GBTG

11-13-2009, 07:22 PM	#4
Redwing1 Front of the Hell Bus Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Audrina's Bedroom Posts: 17,106 Thanks: 15,586 Thanked 15,316 Times in 3,426 Posts	Yes ...They do look familiar .. __________________ A huge thanks to cupofcoffe00 for the sig.

11-13-2009, 09:07 PM	#7
BiggusLaddus Lord High Fapper Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: 69 Gropecunt Lane, England Posts: 1,967 Thanks: 6 Thanked 279 Times in 215 Posts	Let's hope for some cracking nip shots. __________________ Bill Hicks - Tie me to your headboard, throw your legs over my shoulders and let me wear you like a feedbag.

11-13-2009, 09:24 PM	#8
JoshuaCalvert Job? What job? Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 766 Thanks: 2,785 Thanked 9,950 Times in 357 Posts	I always love it when Jen goes on vacation and hits the beach ! Those paparazzi should get their heads out of their asses and start getting some HD videos and Super Ultra High Quality bikini pics. __________________

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

11-13-2009, 06:12 PM	#2
dgenerate 11 Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: England Posts: 3,440 Thanks: 3,415 Thanked 1,227 Times in 497 Posts	Yay, Jen's on holiday again. Keeps fingers crossed for more bikini pics to come

11-13-2009, 07:11 PM	#3
haydaddict Banned Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Snowless Athens Posts: 46,814 Thanks: 22,316 Thanked 58,229 Times in 9,232 Posts	Why do they look familiar?

11-13-2009, 08:38 PM	#6
Cagliostro cayne's slave Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 88 Thanks: 107 Thanked 1,280 Times in 54 Posts	LQ adds

11-13-2009, 09:36 PM	#9
Babes R Us I'm back! Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 4,160 Thanks: 3,439 Thanked 3,793 Times in 626 Posts

11-13-2009, 11:36 PM	#10
Ultraviolet Addicted Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Thanked 10,000,000 Times in 1 Posts. Posts: 1,180 Thanks: 2,558 Thanked 1,029 Times in 284 Posts	This Pap is hopeless - busted on the first day.

11-13-2009, 11:48 PM	#11
Obama is a status Bukkake, please? Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 16 Thanks: 3 Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts	Blurry is about right.

11-14-2009, 02:23 AM	#13
dirtycash I'll make ya famous! Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 37,254 Thanks: 19,910 Thanked 19,233 Times in 2,777 Posts

11-14-2009, 02:24 AM	#14
gronsak Am I allowed to speak? Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 3 Thanks: 0 Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts	btw it's entirely likely I fucked up the math somewhere along the way there.... general point stands, though. The pictures are crap cuz the pap can't get close enough, not because they're using lousy cameras.